Pre-Budget Proposals for the Railway Budget 2007-08
1. Steel Industry
and Railways 1.1 The steel industry
forms a 16% of the total freight carried by the Indian Railways
• For every tonne of steel produced in the country, transportation
is required for 4 million tonnes (mt). Rail is the preferred mode of
transport for steel industry. About 60% of raw materials and 35% of
finished steel freight are carried by Rail. Thus underscoring the
mutual importance of these sectors for each other.
• However, the capabilities of Indian Railways are insufficient to
handle even the current transportation requirements of the Steel
industry let alone the traffic that will be created by the planned
expansions of Steel Capacity from 43 mtpa to 200 mtpa by 2020. The
steel related traffic is expected to go up from current 172 million
tonnes to 800 million tonnes. But total traffic moved by Rail was
only 667 mt in 2005-06.
• Similarly the freight costs are also a problem.
The railway freight per thousand km/tonne is 3 times higher in India
than in case of China and South Korea. To further add to the
problems of the Steel Industry, the railways freight charges on
movement of iron ore were increased by 68% in the just last two
years (from classification 120 to 180). Also steel items remain in
the maximum freight classification (180). This has lead to huge
competitive disadvantage for the Indian Steel producers as freight
forms anywhere between 10 and 15% of the operating cost of steel
making.
• Although railways have improved their
performance over the last few years, yet the quality of the railway
service has remained poor by global standards. Railway's 'Product'
is still limited to providing the 'Transportation' needs of industry
and there is no provision for comprehensive 'Integrated Logistics
Solutions'. Extremely high Transit times of Goods trains- average
speed of goods train 24 km/hr compared to 47 km/hr in case of
Passenger Trains. Indian Railways is still living with an 'Era of
Shortages' mindset - Customers have to run pillar to post to
'Extract' services from the railways. • As
discussed above Indian steel industry is set to expand rapidly
during the next 15 years. Railways have to ramp up their networks
and improve their operational capabilities and performances.
2. Proposals: Freight Rationalization
2.1 Restore Iron Ore Classification back to earlier classification
i.e 120. • The Indian Railways have targeted
Iron ore freight very badly. During the last two years, the Railways
have increased freight tariffs by 68% either by changing the
classification or by adjusting the slab rates. As a result, the cost
of freight of moving iron ore for distance of 554 km has gone up by
Rs 275 per tonne in a busy route. In other words, for every one
million tonne of ore freight movement, the additional burden on the
industry is Rs 27.54 crores.
|
Increase in Railway freight Charges on
Iron Ore on K-K Line |
| Date |
Class |
Freight Charge (Rs) |
Sur-charge * |
Total Frieght (Rs) |
Increase (Rs) |
Increase (%) |
| 28.10.04 |
120 |
403.7 |
0 |
403.7 |
0.0 |
0 |
| 29.10.04 |
130 |
437.3 |
0 |
437.3 |
33.6 |
8.32% |
| 27.11.04 |
140 |
471.0 |
0 |
471.0 |
67.3 |
16.67% |
| 01.04.05 |
160 |
538.2 |
0 |
538.2 |
134.5 |
33.32% |
| 01.12.05 |
180 |
605.5 |
10% |
666.1 |
262.4 |
64.99% |
| 01.07.06 |
180 |
617.4** |
10% |
679.1 |
275.4 |
68.23% |
* Busy route surcharge, ** Revised adjusted slab
• According to the authorities of Indian Railways, this hike was
mainly to cope up with inflation. However, average inflation rate
during the last two years was only 5.1 and 4.1% respectively.
2.2 Rail Freight classification for iron ore booked for port
destinations for coastal shipment should be reduced from 180 to the
level in which other steel majors are operating.
• From 1st December 2005, Indian Railways have increased freight
classification for iron ore booked for port destinations. This is
unfair and has no logic.
2.3 Removal of 20% surcharge on K. K. Line as the Railways had
already recovered capital cost on this line long ago.
• For no reasons, companies that move freight on K K Line pay Rs
109 per tonne more than freight moved on other lines with a distance
of 465 km.
|
Additional Freight Charge on KK Line
for distance of 465 km |
| Date |
Class |
Freight Charge on other line (Rs) |
Freight Charge on KK line (Rs) |
Increase with KK line 20% Surcharge (Rs) |
| 28.10.04 |
120 |
338.8 |
403.7 |
64.9 |
| 29.10.04 |
130 |
367.0 |
437.3 |
70.3 |
| 27.11.04 |
140 |
395.3 |
471.0 |
75.7 |
| 01.04.05 |
160 |
451.7 |
538.2 |
86.5 |
| 01.12.05 |
180 |
559.0 |
666.1 |
107.0 |
| 01.07.06 |
180 |
570.0 |
679.1 |
109.1 |
Note: K-K-Line (Bacheli-Vizaq) actual distance is
465 km, but with surcharge of 20% it is taken as 554.
3. Augmentation of Railway capacities
3.1 Policy on Railway Networks
• Future developments of Railway networks related to steel
industry to be given utmost priority in the annual Railway budgets.
• Considering high concentration of iron ore and coal reserves in
the Eastern States & Karnataka, focus should be to connect mines,
steel plants and ports
3.2 New Railway lines for New Steel Projects
• New track between
Manoharpur-ChotaNagra-Karampada-Tatiba-Barajamda & Manoharpur-Salai,
Karampada-Bolani, Gua-Karampada
• Between Barbil-Koira sector-Roida sector-Keonjhar-Paradip
• Fast completion of Barsua-Haridaspur-Paradip line to reduce the
lead distance from Barbil sector
3.3 Form Separate company to Dedicatedly serve Freight
Operations - Build State of the art dedicated freight
lines/corridors.
3.4 Use Steel only for manufacturing wagons and coaches
• While presenting the Union Budget for Railways,
the Minister for Railways announced a move to try aluminum in place
of steel for the manufacture of railway wagons and coaches.
• The main argument of in support of aluminum is
that it reduces weight by 40% and overcomes the problem of rusting
along with corrosion. But new high strength steels available today
promise a reduction in weight of up to 35% leaving aluminum only
just ahead. While aluminum has the advantage in terms of corrosion
resistance, that alone cannot make it a steel substitute. Steel is a
much better structural material compared to aluminum owing to its
better flexibility, strength and durability. In terms of cost
Aluminum cost 4-5 times higher than steel.
• The Institute of Steel Development & Growth (INSDAG)
has studied the technical facts and found that steel - from all
angles - is the right material for wagons and coaches. Thus as such
there is hardly any reason for the Railways to opt for an alternate
material at much higher cost, coupled with greater risks (safety). |